🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to approve a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," commented the parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are safe and suitable for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of these regions, further nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more measured position. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve user protection.

Even as this international debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.