🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a flawed assessment of Europe. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" agendas pose an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The actual danger facing Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Gap Separating the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. During this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly half of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

The growing economic gap stems from stronger productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus only fourteen in Europe.

This disparity prompts a vital question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does the EU positioned? Experts widely concede it is largely a two-horse race between the US and China, with Europe starting at a clear disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

A number of major factors explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic network for funding startups. Europe still lacks a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented rules hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a product under one set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population size, is divided among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, business failure was once met with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has eroded its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have started to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of major changes.

With the right incentives and rule changes, these assets might enable far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses significant strengths: skilled human capital, excellent schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge tech, it can still dramatically increase productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.